popsweb073003.jpg
popsweb073002.jpg

THE UNSEEN INVISIBLE GOD OF JOHN 1:18

 

        (c) Copyright 12-2006 F. Paul Haney, CFM, Adapted: Fellowship Commentator FC#2006-1
  

PARTS OF THE BIBLE may seem puzzling respecting God and his nature, but God is not the “author” of confusion (1Cor.14:33).  Parts of John’s New Testament gospel appear to suggest that Jesus is God via the “Word” in his prologue hymn (Jn.1:1ff), while at the same time, in other parts, John clearly states that there is only one true God (Jn.17:3). What’s going on?  Who is lying to us?  —John or the interpreters of John?

The answer, my friends, is simple—too simple for some, I suppose.  The “word” or the “logos” metaphorically “came” to dwell with men—it was not Jesus or the Christ.  And the “logos” (word) did not become Jesus—the logos did not mysteriously become a human being.  However, this plain truth is not attractive to many in our midst—those theologians and would-be Trinitarian and Binitarian polytheistic-minded theologians who wish to perpetuate the myth that Jesus is a divine and supernatural God.

Two problems with accepting this truth: (1) Trinitarians would lose their stranglehold on the faithful (which boils down to finances), and, (2) Binitarians (the Armstrong 2-God type) would lose their opportunity to become fully-fledged divine Gods themselves in a family of Gods—humans made into Gods (which boils down to pure and absolute power).  Those in the second category, in spite of any protest from their camp, are looking forward to people bowing down to them and praying to them as their personal Gods.  These future human-Gods have been known to suggest that they would be the Teachers of people to the point that some have assigned the following verse to themselves as one of their godly jobs in the “Millennium”:

“And though the Lord gives you the bread of adversity and the water of affliction, yet your teachers will not be moved into a corner anymore, but your eyes shall see your teachers.  Your ears shall hear a word behind you, saying, ‘This is the way, walk in it,’ whenever you turn to the right hand or when you turn to the left” (Isa.30:20-21, NKJV).  {RSV used throughout unless otherwise noted.}  In fact, many in the Binitarian Camp (Armstrong Movement) embrace a religious “Teacher.”  Elevating this well-paid man (a popular polytheist Binitarian preacher, his followers have been holding “Meet The Teacher” meetings around the USA for several years now wherein this exalted “Teacher” is the center of attention.

“And do not be called teachers; for One is your Teacher, the Christ. 
But he who is greatest among you shall be your servant. 
And whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted” (Matt.23:10-12, NKJV)
.  In appears that, in a religious sense, God does not want us to take the title “Teacher” to ourselves.  The New Testament Greek word for “Teacher” is also translated “Rabbi.”  The book of John also tells us that God is composed of spirit.  “God is Spirit…” (Jn.4:24).  The OT states that God “appeared” to people(Gen.35:9), however it does not say that God “became” a man.  Paul writes that God is invisible.  “He [Jesus] is the image of the invisible God…” (Col.1:15; cf. Gen.1: 27; Heb.11:27).  As you might expect, an “image” of something is not that thing; an image is other than the original.  Check your own mirror.  You see a likeness.  The original and the image reflected are not of the same substance.  The reflection looks and acts the same as the subject, but they are not the same.

The target passage proclaims: “No one has seen God at any time” (Jn.1:18, NKJV; cf. 1Tim. 6:15-16; Ex.33:20).  The idea of God being an invisible spirit presents us with a problem if we choose to believe that the Father is God and that Jesus is (or was) also God.  First, rational English tells us that the worship and support of two or more “Gods” represents polytheism.  Irrational English says otherwise.  Unless we juggle the English language like a circus clown (thus making it irrational), we cannot have a God that is both visible and invisible at the same time.  Nor can we have a God that is both mortal and immortal at the same time—the very definition of “God” presumes immortality.  (Continued...)

 
Site Meter
popsweb073001.jpg